Fedimint uses ecash, it does not use cashu. 

anyone can run their own cashu mint, even on an IP address. Not sure about TOR hosting though.

Fedimint _uses_ Cashu as a component.

JustinNakamoto

Controversial and will take people a long time to see what you're seeing, I think. Took me a while for sure. Fascinating stuff. It's literally made me reconsider (and articulate more clearly) why I dislike shitcoins.

My distaste for shitcoins it's not about decentralization anymore. The difference between a high quality ecash (good federation) vs a shitcoin token is literally one thing - the level of redeemability to bitcoin. Across time, how close can the token get swapped 1:1 to bitcoin.

ETH tokens, XMR, and other shitcoins: at any given moment in time, I have very low confidence they can be swapped 1:1 (same value as the past) to sats.

A high quality ecash token issued by a well-run federation (or even, L-BTC issued by the Liquid federation!), I will have much higher confidence, and so I wouldn't consider that token a "shitcoin".

ecash

Fedimint is Self-Custodial

TonyGiorgio

Controversial and will take people a long time to see what you're seeing, I think. Took me a while for sure. Fascinating stuff. It's literally made me reconsider (and articulate more clearly) why I dislike shitcoins.

My distaste for shitcoins it's not about decentralization anymore. The difference between a high quality ecash (good federation) vs a shitcoin token is literally one thing - the level of redeemability to bitcoin. Across time, how close can the token get swapped 1:1 to bitcoin.

ETH tokens, XMR, and other shitcoins: at any given moment in time, I have very low confidence they can be swapped 1:1 (same value as the past) to sats.

A high quality ecash token issued by a well-run federation (or even, L-BTC issued by the Liquid federation!), I will have much higher confidence, and so I wouldn't consider that token a "shitcoin".