pull down to refresh
41 sats \ 7 replies \ @ek 16 Jan freebie \ parent \ on: Opinion: Spam can't cause high fees - Thriller post bitcoin
Isn't that for a good reason? Since this data doesn't have to be stored in expensive RAM of nodes but can be stored on cheap disk? That was my understanding how this decision to increase tx bandwidth this way was justified.
so pedantic lol
It's still arbitrary. It still has to be downloaded. It still has to be verified. It still has to be stored indefinitely by someone. Who exactly does this discount benefit?
Perhaps when the segwit discount was being decided, the developers involved expected witness data to go in the witness. Now that that's no longer a reasonable expectation, the cost of witness data should be priced the same as the rest of the tx data.
reply
I think that having a conversation about whether segwit should be rolled back or changed is an interesting conversation.
I also think proposals for smaller blocks are interesting.
But I was trying to point out that the conversation around block space right now is, in fact, a conversation about what we want to use bitcoin for and not a technical conversation about a vulnerability or filtering.
reply
reply
I definitely agree that this would increase the cost of inscriptions. Higher price means less demand. But it would also make it more expensive for me to spend from my multisig. I'm not sure if the end result will be bitcoin as money transactions being cheaper (in terms of the total fee i have to pay, not the rate) than they are now.
reply