pull down to refresh
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @cryptocoin OP 26 Jun 2022
The link for this post uses a read-only front-end for Twitter, which can be easier to read for viewing a full Twitter thread. The Tweet that kicked off the thread is:
reply
25 sats \ 0 replies \ @tomlaies 26 Jun 2022
Very true. Under a few million sats it is very hard to run a Lightning node and become self sovereign. It's a challenge we have to solve - excluding large parts of the lower class is unacceptable.
reply
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @faithandcredit 26 Jun 2022
True. But my vision of Bitcoin currently is that its a sort of dark money and something ppl have on the side, custodianship does not fit well into this concept since those are attack vectors from the greater power structures. But if they leave BTC more or less alone then custodianship will be involved in most BTC activity and improving it is key :> Its like a garden that grows on top. But if the power structures poison the soil then what
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @cryptocoin OP 26 Jun 2022
Don't lump in the concept of custodianship like we have with custodial exchanges and custodial wallets (e.g., Wallet Of Satoshi) with the custodianship targets for minimint.
https://blog.blockstream.com/en-blockstream-sponsors-minimint-a-privacy-focused-community-led-scaling-solution-for-bitcoin/
reply