reply on: Zap to Zero Day 17 | Frontier War \ stacker news ~meta

pull down to refresh

51 sats \ 7 replies \ @cryotosensei 14 Jan \ on: Zap to Zero Day 17 | Frontier War meta

What’s a good post to you?

it can be teach me something new, change my thinking about certain things, or bring some fun.

Anything that piques my interest. That can be anything.

So, I wanted to zap your post because I enjoyed it so much but realized I could not because you forwarded me a piece of the pie. Thank you. Maybe we need a way to let stackers who are getting forwarded some sats from a post to zap it without it pumping their own bags? It's not fair to the poster to miss some sats as a result of generosity. I can and do zap your replies within the post, but it limits the visibility and ultimate ranking of the post.

162 sats \ 0 replies \ @davidw 14 Jan

Me 3. Guess I’ll just zap on yesterday’s post instead 😋

472 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek OP 14 Jan freebie

Good point, I didn't think about this when I used the forwarding feature. Next time I will forward to even more people like @grayruby and @Undisciplined.

I noticed the same with this post from @itsTomekK.

I really had to laugh when I saw he forwarded just one 1% to me [0] but it still meant I couldn't zap him haha

Maybe we need a way to let stackers who are getting forwarded some sats from a post to zap it without it pumping their own bags?

Technically possible but we'll have to think about the implications and how easy that is to implement.

Oh, and you reminded me that I wanted to check into our forwarding code anyway because of the prism bug. Maybe I can implement something that fixes this issue, too :)

[0] and 1% was to another account I claimed

161 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 14 Jan

You'll find I have no qualms about "pumping my own bag", as siggy put it.

37 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek OP 14 Jan

I did not expect anything less from you.