pull down to refresh

This is how the Bitcoin price was manipulated and probably someone close to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) made many millions of $ in just 15 minutes.
What happened?
At 3:11 pm, they announce the approval of the Bitcoin ETF from the official @SECGov account on X. At that time the price was ~$44K.
The #bitcoin price rose to $48K mil due to the post, this because thousands of traders and exchanges have algorithms operated by high frequency automated bots reacting to news in real time.
Watch Bitcoin price volatility via Tradingview:
At 3:26 pm, SEC Chairman Gary Gensler announces that the institution's X account has been compromised (hacked) and that post was unauthorized. In other words, the ETF news is FAKE even though it came out from the SEC itself.
Bitcoin thus falls to $44.8K.
By 3:42 pm, the SEC had recovered its account and confirms what its chairman had said.
On @CNBC they say the SEC account was hacked, but from @X a security engineer says it's not true and Musk comments:
An example of what the manipulator could have earned:
Let's say he bought $1 billion in Bitcoin at $44K, which is about BTC 22,727. He then sold at $48K and made $1.091 million. A profit of $91 million in just 15 minutes. Could be more if he traded the 1 min and 5 min candlesticks.
Minimally, the SEC chairman should be investigated and/or removed from office. Regardless of whether there was hacking or not, he should take responsibility for such manipulation.
It is because of things like this that many get confused and say that #Bitcoin is a scam, but it turns out that Bitcoin as a project has nothing to do here, because it is just manipulation of its price based on expectations related to a derivative product such as ETFs. It would be like blaming the cow because its owner let the milk get damaged by not keeping it refrigerated after milking.
For this reason, the best strategy for investing in Bitcoin is with a long-term view (3 years or more).
991 sats \ 2 replies \ @harrr 10 Jan
You're reading too much into this, somebody did it for the lulz.
reply
The "lulz" being becoming absurdly rich by trading.
reply
funniest tweet since Caroline blew up FTX by revealing the FTT margin call
reply
pure speculation based on envy- it is possible, but what do you know,? have any facts to back that up?
reply
They most likely would have used leverage.
reply
Well shit yeah, they don't use any of their own money for anything
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @tomlaies 10 Jan
But what's the reason to doubt the official story? It makes perfect sense, aligns with what happened and most importantly all actors have incentives that make sense.
You're just one of those people that compulsively want to say the opposite. Are you deriving self-confidence and feel smarter than everybody else now?
reply
The reason to doubt the story is they're a bunch of crooks and they're always up to these tricks. Now they don't even care how blatantly obvious they are.
reply
Low IQ Take: "Some guy manipulated the market."
Medium IQ Take: "Hacking is plausible."
High IQ Take: "Hacking is indeed plausible, but some guy absolutely manipulated the market."
reply
3 sats \ 0 replies \ @xz 10 Jan
One thing is valid. Either Twitter's security model is lame or the SEC's.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Ge 10 Jan
Trading bros for rekt maxis bought more bitcoin as we usually do among the announcements fud to over for the non believers hfsp
reply
If it was really for manipulation, they would have made a fake tweet about BTC ETF being declined, and collect on a short as the market is nuking. Seems a lot more obvious that would cause major vol and carnage
reply
They would not have been filled @ 48k for ~$1B.
reply
The clown show continues
reply
Something I don't see people pointing out is that when the "fake" tweet about the ETF being approved went out, the ETH/BTC valuation fell. But when the the SEC account later removed the tweet and said that they were hacked, the ETH/BTC valuation went up quite a bit.
Just saying...
reply
If what Elon Musk says is true, i.e. that SEC account X was not hacked, then this is indeed ultra-serious and means that someone working within the SEC and with access to SEC account X did so probably for personal gain.
As you explain, the SEC chairman should be fired for incompetence!
reply
Plot twist: is was Elon Musk that hacked the SEC account :o
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @harrr 10 Jan
If what Elon Musk says is true
citation needed
reply
reply
deleted by author
reply