Who would like to trigger a new "religion" about six hundred years later, in which he was not able to deny Jesus' presence, but at least tried to:
deny of well proven historical fact of his death by crucifixion and this way to indirectly nullify all other things described above?
and quick and simple rhetorical question:
Who would like to trigger a new "religion" about six hundred years later, in which he was not able to deny Jesus' presence, but at least tried to: deny of well proven historical fact of his death by crucifixion and this way to indirectly nullify all other things described above?