pull down to refresh
And you know he's got a point because of his cowboy hat streak.
And yet you resist calling me sweetie pie?
It was difficult, but I managed.
Thanks, while reading I thought about replying something similar.
Interesting idea though
This point is not clear to me, does it refer to cowboys? If so, to what extent does it influence? Thanks for your comments
the trust of the stacker making the zap
Not necessarily. Trust is a measure of a stacker's history of zapping good content. A cowboy is simply someone who has zapped a certain amount in a given day. The quality of the zap is irrelevant, so far as I know.
Thanks
Maybe it's just me being a dumdum but I don't understand who is the zapper and who is the zapee in these sentences.
I guess it makes intuitive sense that my trust increases when I receive zaps. But I didn't understand that from this quote.
No, you read it correctly. Your trust increases when you zap quality content posted by others. Like in life, it is better to give than to receive.
I know I have it the correct way round. I'm just saying it isn't clearly worded in the quote.
You had better bring it up with customer service.
@k00b @ekzyis here is an alternative wording:
The ranking of your item is affected by:
The amount other stackers zap your post or comment
The trust of the stacker zapping you
The time elapsed since the creation of your item
Zapping your item with more sats amplifies your trust, giving you more influence on an item's ranking. However, the relationship between sats contributed and the stackers influence on item ranking is not linear, it's logarithmic.
The effect a stacker's zap has on your item's ranking is trust*log10(total zap amount) where 10 sats = 1 vote, 100 sats = 2, 1000 sats = 3, and so on ... all values in between are valid as well.
To make this feature sybil resistant, SN now takes 10% of zaps and re-distributes them to the SN community as part of the daily rewards.
I changed the subject to "you" and "the stacker". Alternatively "the zapper" and "the zappee". Or "sender" and "recipient". I like the last one the most because it's clearer. But I guess you probably insist on the "stacker"-lingo.
Pretty much this, you're becoming one of my favorites, sweetie-pie.
Thanks for commenting mate
We can't see what is that trust score, right? Can't verify if we have to trust a hidden trust score. But I guess it works well.
In the SN FAQ, you can find this:
Some of what you are suggesting may already exist.