pull down to refresh

1 sat \ 3 replies \ @zapomatic 31 Dec 2023 \ parent \ on: Dissection of a force-close that already cost me 140k sats lightning
do you have your limits to set 1 pending per peer or are there some peers that you trust more and give higher pending limits? Or is 1 excessively limited?
write
preview
21 sats \ 2 replies \ @C_Otto OP 31 Dec 2023
I have limits, but higher than one. I also have limits like "X attempts per hour", and I also have higher limits for some trusted peers (which I could reach out to, if need be).
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @zapomatic 2 Jan
Do you have a spec on reasonable thresholds? Seems like something everyone should do the right way. I kicked on circuit breaker with the defaults (5 pending / 3600 per hour) and racked up 400 fails on one of my channels. Eased back there but that was unexpected. Using Queue mode now as well...
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @zapomatic 2 Jan
I'm currently manually setting low pending/max hourly rates for a few nodes that I have noticed went offline several times over the last week.
Does trusting a node also mean that you know they have circuit breaker logic that you are matching? Seems like an otherwise trusted node could have no breaker or too high of settings...
reply