pull down to refresh

Did you consider access to capital, taxes, favorable jurisdictions to bitcoin
  • 0 tax on Bitcoin winnings, i.e. liquidation.
  • Incentive for open source
  • Low cost in hiring people to work in the company (labor charges if applicable)
I think that founders can "diversify" risk across several jurisdictions instead of just one, because Governments by nature are unstable and can change laws according to their wishes
How would you diversify risk across several jurisdictions, the parent company is still tied to one specific jurisdiction?
Of course you can have subsidiaries in jurisdictions favorable to for example bitcoin and do all your handling of bitcoin there but that is a lot of overhead for a early stage company
reply
How would you diversify risk across several jurisdictions, the parent company is still tied to one specific jurisdiction?
Parent company and subsidiaries
that is a lot of overhead for a early stage company
Yes, I agree with you on this part. With this, founders can choose a good jurisdiction and later, when they are large companies, open subsidiaries or controlling companies in friendly jurisdictions.
reply
my feeling is (also the reason why i posted this question) is that we as an industry are not optimizing enough for jurisdictional arbitrage, while at the same time its a huge mental burden to also figure out all of this while also trying to build a company/product
reply
we as an industry are not optimizing enough for jurisdictional arbitrage, while at the same time its a huge mental burden to also figure out all of this while also trying to build a company/product
That's point.
reply