111 sats \ 6 replies \ @Public_N_M_E 24 Dec 2023 \ parent \ on: Can we establish "crypto" to mean "cryptography" again? crypto
Really valid counter point, I hadn't thought of the how many times do you run away before standing your ground. And I'm inclined to agree with you, perhaps instead of running from those terms it is time to reclaim them. Show people what crypto is not what they think it is. It's not an angle I had originally looked at it from.
The most funny part is when people try to argue that "crypto" means "cryptocurrencies" and not "cryptography":
The "crypto" in "cryptocurrencies" literally comes from "cryptography". So if "crypto" means anything, it should mean "cryptography" and not only "cryptocurrencies".
reply
Wholely agree. I refer to those types as uneducated. During my time in the military (before the days of BTC) we regularly talked about "crypto" and we were absolutely referencing cryptography and how you concealed or protected information. It's got nothing to do with dog coins 😂
reply
Yeah, I think what changed my view on this is that we don't have to accept the stupidity uneducatedness of some people. We should acknowledge it and do something about it but we don't have to accept it.
Accepting something sounds to me like giving up - as if it's out of your control to do something against it. Small but important detail imo.
reply
It took 3 messages lol but I went from, the move away from them camp to the take it back and have them moved camp courtesy of your comments.
reply
Another related message, lol:
Imo, imagine bitcoiners are hanging out in a pool and having a great time and then some shitcoiners show up and literally shit in the pool. Are we just going to leave the pool to them now?No, we should make them clean up and then tell them gtfoThat's how I like to think about this.It's not as simple though, I agree :)
-- #340581
reply
Best analogy ever.
reply