A lot of people equate open source with being free (as in cost) but there's also free (as in freedom). It's useful to distinguish these two concepts.
Gratis :- without charge
Libre :- having freedom
There's a lot of misconceptions about why people write open source software in the first place.
Sometimes it's about transparency (to see the code).
Sometimes it's about needing help (to write the code)
Sometimes it's about teaching (to show the code)
Sometimes it's about distribution (to share the code)
Sometimes it's about marketing (to get noticed)
Or of course it can be any mix of the above or something I didn't even think about. Usually the license will give you a hint as to which.
Personally I think transparency is the most valuable. I have no problem paying for software but all other things being equal I'd rather pick open source software simply because I can look at the code and see what it does even if I never want or need to change it.
I ran an open source project for years.
A lot of people equate open source with being free (as in cost) but there's also free (as in freedom). It's useful to distinguish these two concepts.
Gratis :- without charge Libre :- having freedom
There's a lot of misconceptions about why people write open source software in the first place.
Or of course it can be any mix of the above or something I didn't even think about. Usually the license will give you a hint as to which.
Personally I think transparency is the most valuable. I have no problem paying for software but all other things being equal I'd rather pick open source software simply because I can look at the code and see what it does even if I never want or need to change it.