pull down to refresh

But since we can never proof that we just don't have the technology yet, this is a paradox. Just like we can't proof that God exists.
You can't prove that god exists or not because it isn't defined, no? I mean to prove something you need to define it firstly. But every human religion has different deity/ies than others, or even nothing (buddhism). Even denominations of the same religion have big differences, like different philosophies and mystical experience. And everyone believe in their definition of god/s and world like it's chosen one, which makes finding "true" definition impossible.
If we accept this premise, isn't it then a choice if you believe in faith or in science?
Well true science like bitcoin doesn't need big trust. It just doesn't care. You can check for yourself the planets of solar system, or with big lake you could estimate the radius of earth! Those will exist regardless of your belief, or even knowledge. That's reality, and you explore it. Faith tries to create virtual one in mind. Even if it mimics reality, without believers it would cease out forever.
Now Bitcoin. It's digital money, but is it virtual one?
edit: I'm kinda late to party)