1690 sats \ 4 replies \ @orthwyrm 14 Dec 2023 \ on: deleted by author bitcoin
I have enjoyed some of your other posts, but I am sorry to say that this one is in poor taste and reeks of negative energy.
I also don't know why you added Luke as a category in the "shitcoiner" section. For all his faults and eccentricities, he has always been Bitcoin-only AFAIK.
Plus, some of these accounts have been dormant for months. I should know, one of them is mine and that's been inactive for close to a year now. Last I checked, I am not a "blockchain enthusiast" and am quite vocal about the problems with shitcoins. There are also some members I recognise from this list whom I rather like, and they don't deserve to be named and shamed in such a fashion.
yeah a literal "name and shame" post for wrongthink on the front page is not a great look, even if it is accurate. which it sounds like this is not.
reply
deleted by author