pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @LaserStack 7 Jun 2022 \ parent \ on: Dealing with Coinjoin Change Outputs bitcoin
Yeah, but no one even mentioned CoinSwap and it's not relevant at all, so why did you even bring it up?
write
preview
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @glix 8 Jun 2022
Because the nature of breaking your history of your on-chain funds will be a coin swap/submarine swap - very different from a coin-join. Also keep in mind, in a coinjoin it's always on chain unlike doing a submarine swap that makes you go off-chain for a brief amount of time.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 8 Jun 2022
People still don't know how to use efficiently LN...
Just an example:
  1. Open a 5M sats channel, could be private or public it doesn't matter too much, in the end.
  2. Do several swaps through that channel in a total amount of 5 BTC, using many swap services (boltz, loop, fixeedfloat, coinos, zigzag, chainmarket etc)
  3. close channel. On the blockchain will be reflected only 5M sats not 5BTC.
Done, you just "wash" 5 BTC.
More examples here: https://darthcoin.substack.com/p/node-liquidity-guide https://darthcoin.substack.com/p/lightning-cleaning-machine https://darthcoin.substack.com/p/lightning-network-submarine-swaps
reply