I don't know exactly what this means in this context, could you be more clear?

Now, I also don't know how this should be tackled, my proposal would be to increase the block size dynamically and algorithmically, something that works this way:

Blocks with heavier transactions are smaller to reduce spam, while blocks with lighter transactions can be bigger to promote 1in1uto TXs and while not killing the inscription of arbitrary data, disincentivizing it; also, bigger blocks will be needed for quantum resistant public keys (choosing a boogie man here, but they are closing in faster than anticipated).

Activating the driverchains proposal would help a lot with this as well, we could limit the functionality of the main chain and yet let the spammers "spam Bitcoin" without us having to run it.

And CTVs, well, I don't even have to argue in favour of them, if anyone thinks CTVs are a negative most surely they are simply conspiratorial or a purist who doesn't want change or progress, only vindication.