I know it's just for fun, but who will decide if a conflict qualifies as a world war?
reply
historians, years later. They might well decide that it started years earlier with regional wars that will draw in more countries. Also, we're hung up on the idea of large land wars involving great powers as a "world war", which might not be what the next one looks like. Also, the last ones were quite Europe-centered; WW1 was only a World War because Europe thought itself The World...
reply
Yes, of course. That's why I asked. I meant specifically with regard to a prediction market wager.
reply
yeah, the prediction market thing only really works if you have uncontested assignments of value or decide by whose assessment it will trigger. "When will bitcoin reach 100000 on gemini" only delivers a clear value only because you specified who gets to decide it. Without the qualifier, do you won if it reaches it only on bitfinex but nowhere else?
This breaks down.. well, almost immediately, especially if we take this whole thing here seriously and don't think that a Knowledge Pope gets to say it for everyone. What's a world war will remain contested for decades. Some historians and political scientists are already calling what we have now a World War. The point is not if they're right or wrong; World War isn't something that just is. It's a contested ascription. It's never clearly right or wrong, it's a contested world out there.
reply
What's a world war will remain contested for decades.
First time I hear of this
reply
It often comes up in media that the first world war was of course not called the first world war when it happened, but they get hung up on the word "first". Time travel movie trope, "ah, this is the first world war!" - "what do you mean, first..."
But it also wasn't called a, or the, world war; it was the "great war" at the time. It only became the first world war when the other one happened, and historians tied them together as two sequential conflicts. The second one now made a new template, and because of that, we only even think of the possibility of another "world war". There were conflicts before both could quite well qualify as conflicts of a similar scope than the first one. The Seven Years War extended to north america, as did the napoleonic wars. Ancient wars spanned the width of the known world. They weren't called a world war because historians hadn't come up with that yet, and it was never applied retroactively, though it well could have been. It's all... wobbly.
reply
I believe it was also called "the war to end all wars".
reply
Oh, it's true. World War 1 wasn't called World War 1 until after WW2, I think.
reply
we wrote our posts at the same time! :) exactly.
reply
Yours was more extensive, though.
next prediction market idea: is bitcoin going to pump or crash during WWIII?
lol :)
reply
Also, the last ones were quite Europe-centered
yeah, I would welcome some variety to that, lol :)
reply
I know it's just for fun
"just for fun", lol :) such an American thing to say, lol :)
but who will decide if a conflict qualifies as a world war?
good point, i think i thought of any war that is not a proxy war between any two countries that are equipped with (nuclear) ICBMs.
reply
I agree with ChatGPT, because WWIII has probably already started.
reply
You mean a cold WWIII because of Russia <> Ukraine and China <> America over Taiwan? Not a hot WWIII?
reply
No, I think it's quite likely that when historians look back, they'll date WWIII as starting with Russia/Ukraine or Israel/Palestine. If the American coalition loses, 9/11 might even be taken as the start date of a very long international conflict that eventually drew the rest of the world in.
reply
Already started. These things take time (years to truly develop), but the history books will talk about the Sahel region of Africa, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, Gaza, and Yemen as the earlier conflicts of WW III.
reply