pull down to refresh
77 sats \ 4 replies \ @k00b 6 Jun 2022 \ parent \ on: Daily discussion thread
No reason other than I haven't ever added title length. I was thinking a limit somewhere in 80-140 chars is good.
Could even do something fun like, every character after 80 is 1 more sat, or exponentially more sats, or whatever.
True, adding exponential cost for posters could be an interesting solution. We'd probably want to be super clear with users about how the fees are structured though... the simpler the system, the better.
Also, I think Google begins truncating titles after 55-70 characters, so that's a reference point for SEO considerations.
reply
that would be hilarious if each post cost 1 sat per x amount of characters. less shit talking i would imagine and more concise comments. heh
reply
💡 An idea for a future sub!
reply
I really like that idea. Put your money where your mouth is... literally :)
Why not for all comments?
reply