Everything you said after your first sentence seems to support my dichotomy

If you can't have money in the first place without rules then you certainly can't have people spending it how they want, because (1) "spending it how you want" means "spending it without rules," (2) without rules it can't exist, and (3) you can't spend something that doesn't exist

Rules create the possibility of money and simultaneously limit how it can be spent

Your false dichotomy is incompatible with logic. Without rules there wouldn’t be a definition of money to spend. When saying people should spend how they want, there’s an implicit assumption that there are rules governing what money is. Dropping all the rules invalidates the axioms on which the statement was made.

netstatic

Because rules stop people from spending how they want

You have to pick: option 1, people can spend how they want. Option 2, there are rules

You can't have both options because they are incompatible

supertestnet

bitcoin

Luke Dashjr said that Ordinals & BRC20 will no longer exist on Bitcoin.

Cowboy

How did you go from him stating people should be able to spend how they want to Bitcoin not having rules?