pull down to refresh

There's a lot of discussion around this announcement recently boosted by Jack Dorsey.
Some say it's censorship, while some others think it's necessary. What are your thoughts?
PSA: “Inscriptions” are exploiting a vulnerability in #Bitcoin Core to spam the blockchain. Bitcoin Core has, since 2013, allowed users to set a limit on the size of extra data in transactions they relay or mine (-datacarriersize). By obfuscating their data as program code, Inscriptions bypass this limit.
This bug was recently fixed in Bitcoin Knots v25.1. It took longer than usual due to my workflow being severely disrupted at the end of last year (v24 was skipped entirely).
Bitcoin Core is still vulnerable in the upcoming v26 release. I can only hope it will finally get fixed before v27 next year.
Isn’t —datacarriersize specific to null data transactions? I thought inscriptions were stored in witness data. Seems like he’s implemented a completely different filter flag.
reply
Here's some interesting ideas by Will from Damus on this topic:
reply