POLL: Will there be fewer Sats stacked on Stackernews if the BTC price rises? 🚀 \ stacker news ~bitcoin

POLL: Will there be fewer Sats stacked on Stackernews if the BTC price rises? 🚀

860 sats \ 30 comments \ @NewsnNudes 4 Dec 2023 bitcoin freebie

Do you think people will be less willing to zap Sats for posts on Stackernews if the price continues to rise?

yes definitely22.2%

Sats shot gun incoming22.2%

business as usual55.6%

18 votes \ poll ended

view all related items

12 sats \ 3 replies \ @orthwyrm 4 Dec 2023

I'm not sure, but that's a very interesting question.

Is there any way to access SN's zapping statistics? Such as sats zapped per user across time?

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @NewsnNudes OP 4 Dec 2023

Are you working for the NSA?

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @orthwyrm 4 Dec 2023

yea lol

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @NewsnNudes OP 4 Dec 2023

I reckon that's where the shit fiat at, right?

268 sats \ 15 replies \ @Zepasta 4 Dec 2023

deleted by author

155 sats \ 14 replies \ @NewsnNudes OP 4 Dec 2023

@siggy47, @DarthCoin, @Natalia, @TomK, @0xbitcoiner, @TNStacker, @elvismercury - Bet the takes from other influencers are hella interesting, right?

20 sats \ 2 replies \ @TomK 4 Dec 2023

Well, what I can say sounds maybe a bit funny but I fell in love with SN and the general atmosphere here. It taught me without even noticing it thinking more and more in terms of Sats. And as I am living by more than 90% on a BTC standard this new cycle has a complete different affect on me. So: I think it will have a negative impact but it won't be that extreme as I guess that a lot here feel the same or at least shifting towards it.

19 sats \ 1 reply \ @TomK 4 Dec 2023

AND: a bull market will attract more participants in SN and generate faster growth what could overcompensate the ''savings affect''

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Zepasta 4 Dec 2023

deleted by author

20 sats \ 7 replies \ @DarthCoin 4 Dec 2023

talking about BTC price is meaningless and useless. Also making polls about.

5 sats \ 6 replies \ @NewsnNudes OP 4 Dec 2023

Yo, it's really about that zap readiness, not just the BTC price in this poll—more like the whole surge that comes with it, you feel me Geezer?

0 sats \ 5 replies \ @DarthCoin 4 Dec 2023

if the price continues to rise?

Your poll question is LITERALLY about the price. So... I DON'T GIVE A FUCKING SHIT.

You are more interested in assmilking than deliver good content.

10 sats \ 3 replies \ @Zepasta 4 Dec 2023

Hm, what "assmilking" mean?

10 sats \ 2 replies \ @DarthCoin 4 Dec 2023

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @TNStacker 4 Dec 2023

🤣🤣🤣

reply on another page

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @NewsnNudes OP 4 Dec 2023

That looks mad good, fam.

reply on another page

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @NewsnNudes OP 4 Dec 2023

Who ain't into proper assmilking, right?

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @TNStacker 4 Dec 2023

First, I am extremely flattered, and unworthy, to be associated with this group of thinkers.

I think business as usual for those who are here. The increases will come from SN new users. I expect exponential growth as more people realize all the shit that's out there.

10 sats \ 1 reply \ @NewsnNudes OP 4 Dec 2023

No need to be all flattered and play down your worth, innit? your opinion is straight-up valued. Look at our buddy @DarthCoin he's laying bare the intimate details like it's nothing.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @TNStacker 4 Dec 2023

Thanks anyhow.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @elvismercury 4 Dec 2023

Working hypothesis: higher btc price = higher interest in btc = more people wandering into SN = more zapping.

I think zaps are a general function of enthusiasm + vibe more than financial calculus. The average zap amount is so miniscule that the price could 10x without anybody really feeling it.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @NewsnNudes OP 4 Dec 2023

simple math.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @carlosfandango 4 Dec 2023

deleted by author

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Zepasta 4 Dec 2023

deleted by author

0 sats \ 5 replies \ @tomlaies 4 Dec 2023

Some of y'all are just here to stack and don't give back. And it shows. It's ridiculous since the amounts of money are minuscule.