pull down to refresh
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 3 Dec 2023
People should watch this... to understand what is going on...
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6YJKmf98opcj/
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @fm 4 Dec 2023
ahhh, the city..
a contry inside a city.. wicked..
City on london
Washington, D.C.
Vatican..
This is where the masters work from..
reply
3 sats \ 3 replies \ @Taurus 3 Dec 2023
Fighting climate change is a noble cause. Hope all the funds will go directly toward that problem! Nobody wants to pay for that but trillions are going for defense/wars
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @xz 3 Dec 2023
.. trillions of digital units of currency loaned into existence that is causing massive irrecoverable losses in purchasing power.
Tell me how purchasing power is recoverable, or tell me how theft is noble.
'Cause' is manufactured to disguise this reality.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Taurus 4 Dec 2023
Noble cause. Saving our future is a noble cause. Our economies, societies, our lifes are based on us using and exploiting nature. We need to help nature if we want to slow climate change and avoid more costs. As a bitcoiner I'll stick to my motto : It is by achieving our ends through effort, by being prepared to sacrifice immediate profits for the long-term well-being of others, that we will achieve happiness characterized by peace and genuine contentment.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @xz 4 Dec 2023 freebie
I'll agree that there are certain things that warrant being a good steward for the betterment of our natural environment but I'm not convinced that anthropogenic factors (co2) warrant concern over a self-regulating climate.
Evidence obtained from research carried out has measured much greater volatility in the Earth's temperature and this happened before the use of abiotic fuel sources. Ascribing co2 to that is not only inaccurate, it's actually wrong.
Erroneously assessing anthropogenic effects by referencing the last few hundred years of the Holocene is not even referencing data from earlier times in the Cenozoic epoch (which has corroborated greater climatic variation and a greater degree of volatility.)
But we can agree to disagree on this until there is real scientific debate that lends credibility to the notion. As the situation stands, published scientific research and political overreach steer debate and attempt to gaslight public consensus.
IMO, peace and contentment can only be found in truth itself which will guide rationality and ultimately an equitable, symbiotic understanding of, and relationship with nature. Not trying to be divisive. I welcome debate.
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @xz 3 Dec 2023
There's nothing more of poor taste than for a rich man to ask others to pay for lunch.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @orthwyrm 3 Dec 2023
If it makes you feel any better, Charles isn't popular over in the UK and most people I know can't bring themselves to call him "king". I live in a touristy area and the Charles souvenirs gather dust while the Elizabeth souvenirs continue to sell like hot-cakes.
reply
50 sats \ 0 replies \ @carlosfandango 3 Dec 2023
deleted by author
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @NewsnNudes 3 Dec 2023 freebie
damn, crap level 100000