If one recalls the emphasis with which German politicians acted during the last financial market crisis and literally invaded southern European states with their troika and sacrosanct austerity rules with bizarre seriousness, it seems more than understandable why the term ''Schadenfreude'' is now doing the rounds among those who were once on the Teutonic moral pillory of ''guilt and atonement''.
The proof that shadow budgets, fiscal megalomania and reputation-damaging creative accounting are not specialties of the Southern Europeans has now been provided by a coalition of convinced political benefactors, green world saviors and pseudo-market economists, who have managed to add at least one more curiosity to the process of state failure: the mountain of debt redeclared as ''special assets''. This conceptual twist appears so curious in its shrill antinomy that those once scolded will certainly have difficulties transferring it into their own semantic theater of distraction.
But the ECB will certainly be on hand to provide expert translation advice and assistance. After all, it has to ''finance'' all the happily sprouting special assets.
Excellent, Tom! I hope you're publishing this somewhere in German.
reply
Thank You very much. It could be embedded in a larger piece. Like: "Rembering Greece''
reply
Yes. That seems like a long time ago.
reply
The myth says it's just a decade... people forget so fast.
reply
Is the "Special Asset" move the one where they take them off of the liability side of the ledger and move them to the asset side with a negative present value. I recall either the Fed or the US Treasury doing a move like that.
reply
Yes. It's like that
reply
Not sure whether a similar notion was named good bank/bad bank, circa 2008 After specific bank failures, they just bury some toxic debt in a radioactive landfill and strip any remaining assets to pump into some share offering that ultimately gets refinanced by the public and takes a hit.
Special Assets .. Credit Crunch. Sounds like making the unpalatable, palatable.
reply
It's always the same principle. The state takes on debt to prop up ideological projects and to keep the masses calm with ''initiatives'' and welfare bs that destroys in the end the basis of society (family, middle class, free entrepreneurship). Than they default in numerous of their institutions just to hide the insolvent debt in new ones or hidden balance sheets. And so on.
reply
If I'm remembering 2008 correctly, the Fed bought bundles of "distressed" assets off of the banks at roughly pre-recession market prices and claimed that they were going appreciate over time (when everybody knew they were going to remain worthless).
reply
I guess we can call this ''reflating'' the bubble. That's what they'll do again.
reply
In that case, you're onto their scheme faster than anyone caught onto it over here.
reply