pull down to refresh
208 sats \ 1 reply \ @nerd2ninja 27 Nov 2023
Oh. This is a channel factory
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @megaptera 27 Nov 2023
hmmm, I don't know. Its more of a fat channel pool.
reply
20 sats \ 3 replies \ @megaptera 27 Nov 2023
interesting. That could be indeed a game changer.
Here is the original lightning-dev mailinglist post: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2023-August/004057.html
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @nerd2ninja 27 Nov 2023
"In the attachment" where's the attachment???
reply
785 sats \ 0 replies \ @megaptera 27 Nov 2023
here: http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20230820/bfb41b20/attachment-0001.pdf
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ClickForCharity OP 27 Nov 2023
The first link didn't work it looks like it was "scrubbed" but the second one leads to a pdf https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20230820/bfb41b20/attachment-0001.pdf
reply
5 sats \ 0 replies \ @trevor 27 Nov 2023
Ooooh very nice! Bitcoin development continues to blow me away!
reply
5 sats \ 0 replies \ @Wumbo 28 Nov 2023
Sound promising. My first thought was what happens if one of the peer is offline. The below quote from the PDF seems to address this. There are always trade off but sounds like a force close of the channel could get more expensive then a regular Lightning Channel
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Zepasta 28 Nov 2023
Really interesting!
reply