pull down to refresh
1026 sats \ 5 replies \ @elvismercury 26 Nov 2023 \ parent \ on: SN Saturday Newsletter 11/25/23 meta
You're free to do whatever you want, of course, but why? You said it once. Presumably you were okay with it mapping it to your nym. What's different?
There are use cases for ephemeral content, probably everyone here knows that. But having only ephemeral content is a bad deal.
Actually, this might make a good SN post.
Actually, this might make a good SN post.
I think so, too.
reply
deleted by author
reply
These are good responses, it's given me a lot to noodle on. I'll post something about it soonish I think.
not sure exactly what you mean, mapping to my nym. elaborate?
I think you answered this indirectly, but basically: you say things in public for all to see. Every time you post or comment, you're agreeing (explicitly or implicitly) to have the post or comment associated, publicly, with your nym (the person "nemo" appears to be), to whoever happens to read it.
Now I think I can simulate your response to that:
"I made the comments in passing, in the flow of a conversation, knowing that people would read them. But that's different from having those comments floating out there for all of time, available to people who were not in the flow of that conversation."
It raises some interesting philosophical issues about what we're even doing here, and what affordances could support that.
reply
"I made the comments in passing, in the flow of a conversation, knowing that people would read them. But that's different from having those comments floating out there for all of time, available to people who were not in the flow of that conversation."It raises some interesting philosophical issues about what we're even doing here, and what affordances could support that.
I think it means that we're all just guests on the internet and no one is entitled to anything except maybe spam :)
reply
deleted by author
reply