The other day @TNStacker posted a story about preventing your UTXOs from becoming dust. This taps into one of my sources of paranoia about the accessible sats trending toward zero over time. The logic is something like:
- btc becomes vastly more popular
- block subsidy shrinks
- fee rates rise
- normal-size stacks turn to dust
The 'solution' to this is to migrate transactions less than some giant sum to L2 of some type, either literal L2; or some quasi-L2 custodianship, federation, etc. But I obsess with the idea of all this fragmentation, where so many of the stacks become inaccessible; and that's saying nothing about the coins that keep getting lost over time. It's like the heat death of the universe, but in software.
I don't really have a point other than this is a thing I think about. Presumably someone has explored the idea before. Links or thoughts would be welcome.
68 vB × 300 ṩ/vB × 100 = 2'040'000 ṩ
min_utxo_amount = input_weight × feerate / percentage