pull down to refresh
Not “will be.” That is not the accurate timing. Okay, good.
So share with us this flaw that already exists that is going to ruin Bitcoin then. You still haven’t done that.
No, I will not do that. I've really gone very far here. I said what I could. Thank you for your attention and also for not crucifying me right away. I would like to say goodbye at this point and will not comment on this topic again. Thank you!
That’s what I thought. Have a nice day :)
No, but: Many people will lose their investments. I would like to warn you about this. I would also like to point out that dead capital is worthless to people.
There were 553k transactions (economic activity) in the last 24 hours, with another 225k transactions in the mempool. And that’s just L1.
Doesn’t seem dead to me.
Fiat and bitcoin are dead capital, even if you play around with them a bit. Capital should be used beneficially for people. If Zacchaeus, from my example elsewhere, moves his treasures around a bit and tries to restock the money, there is no benefit for the population. What I mean is not stacking, but setting. Makes the stored energy available for the benefit of people. If money lies unused, no matter where and in what form it is stored, it will not be available for the benefit of people.
Of course there will be flaws discovered in Bitcoin. That statement is a far cry from “Bitcoin will fail due to unknown and advanced security threats” and “people will lose all of their deposits”.
“But Bitcoin will fail, that’s a fact” doesn’t sound like acknowledging the possibility of flaws in Bitcoin to me.