pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 9 replies \ @ek 15 Nov 2023 \ parent \ on: Taking a sabbatical from Bitcoin FOSS meta
interesting take, can you elaborate?
writes this and then joins the mess, lol
Because we don’t really need anymore “upgrades”
Social contributions fuel adoption.
reply
Because we don’t really need anymore “upgrades”
Also interesting take
And you were using the past tense:
than code updates ever could
I think fixing some critical bugs in the early days was a necessary condition for social contributions to even start
Social contributions fuel adoption.
With this I can somewhat agree, I guess.
reply
If we wouldn't use and teach others how to use Bitcoin, all that code and software built were for nothing.
In all these 10+ years I onboarded hundreds of people and helped many merchants to start with Bitcoin.
As I said, each participant in the network have its own role. Without his coding, all these people will not be into Bitcoin. That's a fact. Only writing code for Bitcoin is NOT enough.
reply
Only writing code for Bitcoin is NOT enough.
Yes, I don't disagree. I just didn't see good arguments so far why social contributions should be more important than technical stuff like coding, reviewing, testing etc.
reply
It’s chicken or egg.
Goes back to base case for peer to peer electronic cash.
If people do not see the problem with fiat government money then it doesn’t matter how functional Bitcoin is.
reply
Maybe my point is this:
Technical contributions create an upper limit for adoption.
Social contributions fuel adoption, but only until this limit is reached.
Then we need upgrades again like channel factories, easier (and actual) lightning backups, some
OP_VAULT implementation for even more secure onchain funds, a lot of UX stuff ...reply
Sure. We cannot stop where we are right now. We have a long way to go with many things to improve the code and create more solutions.
So many things have to be built and used.
Quitting right now is not an option.
reply
deleted by author
reply
deleted by author
reply