zaps forwarded to @benthecarman (33%)
141 sats \ 16 replies \ @quark 13 Nov 2023
Imagine if we go and fork to using Blake and make all miner ASICS useless 😂
reply
420 sats \ 10 replies \ @jk_14 13 Nov 2023
Imagine if SHA256 is suddenly broken and make all miner ASICs useless
then we go and fork to ASIC-proof GPU mineable algo, as Satoshi wanted:
https://cointelegraph.com/news/satoshi-invented-gpu-mining-to-defend-the-network-says-early-dev
reply
0 sats \ 8 replies \ @ek 14 Nov 2023
maybe I didn't read the article properly since I already know the story from another source
but where in this is mentioned that Satoshi wanted an ASIC-proof GPU mineable algo?
reply
0 sats \ 7 replies \ @jk_14 14 Nov 2023
"the big attraction is that anybody can download Bitcoin and start mining"
and he wanted "big attraction" or he didn't want ?
reply
0 sats \ 6 replies \ @ek 14 Nov 2023
Why remove the "But right now" from the quote?
The actual quote is:
"But right now, the big attraction is that anybody can download Bitcoin and start mining with their laptop."
reply
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @jk_14 14 Nov 2023
so wouldn't he like to have a big attraction as long as possible - like almost every human being? :)
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek 14 Nov 2023
Yes but not necessarily as "anybody can download Bitcoin and start mining with their laptop". Most people probably stopped mining after they found out within a few days that it makes their machine too hot or too slow, it's too noisy, etc.
So it was always only the initial attraction. Nowadays, I would say the big attraction are the crazy bull markets.
So isn't bitcoin still a big attraction?
Since we're here thanks to all previous bull markets?
And because enough people got interested in bitcoin early on for whatever reasons?
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @jk_14 14 Nov 2023
most people probably bought second GPU in pre-ASIC era, that's why you had bull markets (network were rising)
the biggest attraction would be to have a steady and sure 2% increase per month of Bitcoin purchasing power :)
view replies
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @chungkingexpress 13 Nov 2023
Fascinating read, and other details?
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @shyfire OP 14 Nov 2023
Seems like keccak is the ASIC friendly replacement for sha256, not Blake.
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @anon 14 Nov 2023
No, keccak isn't implementable with SHA256 hashers. You'd have to make a whole new ASIC, at which point keccak or Blake could be implemented in the hardware just as easily.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @shyfire OP 14 Nov 2023
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @petertodd 14 Nov 2023
That reply is wrong in the context of PoW mining, as PoW mining is already trivially parallelizable.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @shyfire OP 14 Nov 2023
deleted by author
reply
100 sats \ 2 replies \ @benthecarman fwd 13 Nov 2023
Why do you forward to me? I have nothing to do with this lol
reply
200 sats \ 0 replies \ @shyfire OP 14 Nov 2023
Haha I had a draft post about mutiny from weeks ago. Then when i went back and cleared the post details, the forward stuff was hidden and I didn't realize
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @netstatic 13 Nov 2023
I guess I'll have to delete the "blake hashers" telegram group using your twitter profile pic as the figurehead then 😬 😂
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 14 Nov 2023
"No: SHA2 lacks the structure the SHA1 attack relies on it (SHA1 has a linear message schedule, which made it possible to work out a differential cryptanalysis attack on it)."
That advantage isn't there any more now that dedicated SHA256 instructions have been added to x86, ARMv8, and other commonly used platforms.
reply