pull down to refresh
21 sats \ 7 replies \ @k00b 24 May 2022 \ parent \ on: Daily discussion thread
It's trickier than that. How do we determine the top 5 stackers without establishing trust first? We'd have to "trust" that they're the top 5, but we can't.
Everyone trusts themselves, they are a singularity of trust to themselves, so that seems like a more natural seed.
I was talking about distribution.
reply
I see. Currently we redistribute even to users who contribute non-top content even days ago, just less.
reply
Oh, okay.
Also.. will there ever be a better way of doing these long reply chains?
reply
I'd love to make them better. How do you recommend we do them?
reply
hmm.. maybe collapse it into some chatroom like thing instead of nesting based on some heuristic (like only if two people are replying to each other)
possibly a "chat" reply type that makes everything below it one single long thread, and no "pay 10 sats for 2nd reply" thing.
reply
That's an interesting idea. I'll think on it some more.
reply
it would as far as your code is concerned a post with a special type -- and the child posts cannot have replies
sort by time (latest last), ignore duplicate replies on same level for this type so it's 1 sat per msg
reply