pull down to refresh
449 sats \ 24 replies \ @kepford 25 Oct 2023 \ parent \ on: 2 New bug reports DELETED from Samourai Wallet's Gitlab Repo bitcoin
Would be nice if devs could act like adults. I say this as a dev.
The problem lies with Samourai, who has created coinjoin software so bad it is indistinguishable from a fed backdoor. If those devs were adults, actually intending to create a secure coinjoin implementation, they'd fix those issues. They have not.
Hopefully, they're just children rather than feds.
reply
Only Samourai have issues? Any Coinjoin implementation have
reply
Woah. It's that bad hey?
I've never used coinjoins... seems like a hot wallet honeypot tbh
reply
Trezor offers coinjoins with full privacy for cold wallets.
reply
Interesting, I'd love to read about this fed backdoor thing... all I have ever heard is childish rock throwing from both sides frankly. Very few mature explanations of tradeoffs.
reply
Surely there is a well written explanation out there of all the trust issues with Samourai.
reply
Here's Peter Todd: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPNFdhZUGmk
And Greg Maxwell: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=279249.msg51128834#msg51128834
reply
So this is about the default Samourai mobile wallet? IE if you aren't running your own Dojo? I've heard this debate between the two teams. See, when you don't explain WHY you don't like x and you don't debate it fairly in the way those you oppose would agree with you lose credibility with me. Peter Todd doesn't seem to be being clear with the tradeoffs. Its much easier and fun to just say x sucks.
reply
I find it very weird to think of someone who is coinjoing but is also not using their own node... like who even does that?
reply
I agree- Samourai continues to decline any debates, I would really love an explanation from them myself.
reply
My guess is that they do not believe it will be a good faith debate. Based on this debate from CD76: DEBATE: Are the tradeoffs of Samourai Wallet's light client mode a benefit to users? and the conversations I've seen it would be very annoying.
My comment about grown ups remains. Both sides seem to be way to emotional about this and lack the ability to clearly explain the trade-offs in a concise clear way. Odell did his best but it was painful to listen to the debate.
I have no idea if Samourai is a honey pot. When you start there you lose credibility. The issue is that you are trusting Samourai when you use their node instead of your own node. That's the issue. Samourai's app does suggest you use your own node.
These "debates" usually turn into pissing matches and aren't interesting or helpful. Reminds me of comments like VPNs are a scam. Or Tor is a honey pot. Its lazy incomplete communication promoted by social media culture.
reply
I'm afraid you are mistaken, Samourai's app does not ever suggest you use your own node, all privacy features are disabled by default and they said no PR will ever be merged to warn users about the risks: https://web.archive.org/web/20230417145554/https://code.samourai.io/wallet/samourai-wallet-android/-/issues/458
hah I would take it one step further and you can actually argue that even if you are using your own node, you are still trusting them. What if they control all the other UTXOs going into a CJ round? There is no way to verify that they do not.
It will be interesting to see if their upcoming decentralized coordinator release addresses this concern I have.
I had a feeling this was a waste of time. Sorry I asked about this.
reply
Thanks... a 1 hour video... wow.
reply
It's the very first question in the video, you don't have to watch the whole thing.
reply
Me too. Kruw is a Wasabi developer and people from Samourai confirmed it for me, and I also checked on BitcoinTalk and it was confirmed again.
Sometimes we don't need to FUD each other because of ego. I think this fight is endless nonsense.
reply
reply
In my many years of working in tech I've developed a pretty quick BS detector. Sometimes folks just suck at explaining things but most of the time these people don't really understand something well enough explain it. Instead they just just say x sucks because of y and never explain x or y. Then act like you're a dummy because you don't believe them. Its a special kind of person.
reply
Haha. True
reply
It's called "Peer Review", and it's not FUD, read the issues for yourself.
reply
Ah, so this is the reproducible builds thing.
reply
No, not at all.
reply