pull down to refresh

10 sats \ 9 replies \ @DarthCoin OP 17 May 2022 \ parent \ on: Doing automatic payouts to users on the Lightning Network bitcoin
With 1BTC liquidity, I think that SN node is well covered with liquidity... https://amboss.space/node/03cc1d0932bb99b0697f5b5e5961b83ab7fd66f1efc4c9f5c7bad66c1bcbe78f02
write
preview
0 sats \ 8 replies \ @022d99acc7 18 May 2022
Please elaborate more how is the "1BTC liquidity" related to LUD-14's balanceCheck.
reply
0 sats \ 7 replies \ @DarthCoin OP 18 May 2022
Something went wrong with this message. This was a reply to another post in another thread. @k00b can you check ?
reply
0 sats \ 6 replies \ @k00b 18 May 2022
What was this supposed to be a reply to? It might help me figure out what went wrong
reply
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @DarthCoin OP 18 May 2022
It was a reply about how SN could be scaled or something like that, somebody asked about that if SN grows too fast, how will handle it. If I remember was in a daily discussion, maybe?
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b 18 May 2022
Was it this one? #29091
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @DarthCoin OP 18 May 2022
yes, this is it!
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 18 May 2022
What's weird is that your comment was supposedly created before that one.
Theirs: time 2022-05-17T11:59:56.999+00:00 id 29091 Yours: time 2022-05-17T11:58:41.529+00:00 id 29090
This shouldn't be possible ...
And the comment in this thread it showed up under:
time 2022-05-17T09:27:21.506+00:00 id 29053
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin OP 18 May 2022
And I am quite sure I was replying inside that thread. Matrix glitch :)
reply on another page
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 18 May 2022
I think I know the one you're talking about thanks.
reply