pull down to refresh

In order to maintain the peg, we limit trades that may weaken the peg indirectly

So basically, it should be illiquid. This is a very old post about the topic.

https://medium.com/@bob.mcelrath/on-the-in-stability-of-stablecoins-517b7d17c3ee

Onchain/LN liabilities + Perpetual Futures are probably more robust than that.

https://notgeld.medium.com/when-sats-become-the-standart-83585494f3af

This is what we have done in Valet initially. Currently, we are hedging our liabilities on the spot market. Unfortunately, perps are very KYC-ed, or otherwise, exchanges aren't liquid enough.

reply

🤣🤣another Luna shitcoin

reply
reply

The whole idea of a stablecoin is moronic. Bitcoin itself is the stablecoin. People pushing for use of stablecoins simply do not understand how free market works and they still want to live into a fiat world.

reply

It is not moronic. It needs to be re-phrased into "stable purchasing power contracts."

But Bitcoin needs diverse commodity markets to dominate globally. There is only little chance that El Salvador could handle it.

reply

your stablecoining defense is disturbing

reply

Your lack of realization of how far we are from Bitcoin commodity markets is disappointing. Basically, Bitcoin is still on shitcoin casino/financial speculative asset stage with only a slight chance to play some auxiliary role in energy markets.

We are pro-Bitcoin but we are not the same.

reply
reply