Satoshi wanted the chain to decide ownership of coins. But, in v1.0.13, BSV introduced DARA (Digital Asset Recovery Alert) which introduced the ability to confiscate coins through court order. This makes their blockchain not an immutable ledger, but the ownership of coins decided by judges in various jurisdictions. In certain jurisdictions, women have limited abilities to own property. In others, certain religious or ethnic groups may have such limits. BTC has been helpful in these situations. Digital money that complies with the laws of government is not an innovation. of course, since blockchains are blind, someone must "tell" the blockchain what the judge decides, it leaves the opportunity for "someone" (I wonder who) to be able to adjust the ownership of coins for ANYONE on this cursed chain. Nobody's BSV holdings are safe from confiscation, and it's yet another reason that exchanges had to delist the coin. But the biggest reason I think they had to add this feature is that Craig was suing some Bitcoin developers to attempt to get them to confiscate some Bitcoin he says was stolen from him. Can't sue to confiscate if you don't confiscate yourself.