pull down to refresh
134 sats \ 15 replies \ @k00b 23 Sep 2023 \ on: Stacker Saloon
The safe strategy is to overestimate people because you're conflicted to believe otherwise. The most obvious tell for a weak ego is underestimating people by default. If you really want to fuck with the weak egoed, provide everything they need to underestimate you.
Maybe in tech. Try to run a low skill labour driven business for 15 years. If your default isn't expect bare minimum and hope to be pleasantly surprised you will be on the fast track to an early grave.
We can get into a debate about nature v.s nurture, educational opportunities, systemic poverty and all the other factors that may contribute but the chasm between the highly educated/highly productive and the barely employable has never been greater. For me, the overarching theme is decision making. People who end up successful tend to make good decisions or at least learn from the bad ones they make, while people who struggle all their lives tend to do the same dumb shit over and over in all facets of their life (work, home, health wise, financially).
I can't tell you how many times I hired people for jobs and they just never showed up or showed up for a couple days and never returned, without even the courtesy of a phone call. I can't tell you how many times I woke up to a phone call at 2 or 3am in the morning and had to rush somewhere because someone didn't show up, or did show up did half of what they were supposed to do or screwed something up I had to fix.
Not trying to drag down your optimistic outlook. Just sharing my experience.
reply
I can see this being true. We don't disagree. I'm not saying you should invest in randos using this logic. I'm mostly trying to dissuade people from shorting randos who are operating independently.
If someone has something to gain from your estimate of them, you should probably tend toward withholding judgement with a heavy pinch of discounting them.
reply
Fair.
reply
I swear, I have to read your thoughtful comments over and over to fully digest them.
reply
I'm sorry lol.
Also I wasn't very good at commenting until I was forced to do it a lot on here. If it's something you'd like to try on, I'd casually recommend just starting. Main downside is that writing is time consuming but it does feel less time consuming as you do it more.
I've grown to appreciate writing as a form of async inter-process communication between me and other people ... you can upgrade from a monolith to a micro-service connected to a bunch of other amazing micro-services.
(h/t @plebpoet reframing networking as "interfacing" for me)
reply
I'm sorry lol.
Don't be. It wasn't a complaint, more of a compliment that you make me think, which is good.
Also I wasn't very good at commenting until I was forced to do it a lot on here. If it's something you'd like to try on, I'd casually recommend just starting Main downside is that writing is time consuming but it does feel less time consuming as you do it more.
Makes sense, it takes practice, like most things. Just gotta find the time.
I've grown to appreciate writing as a form of async inter-process communication between me and other people ... you can upgrade from a monolith to a micro-service connected to a bunch of other amazing micro-services.
This is a very effective analogy, thank you!
As I'm writing this comment, I also think that adding "quote reply" support might be nice, like GitHub offers.
reply
As I'm writing this comment, I also think that adding "quote reply" support might be nice, like GitHub offers.
That would be helpful. Especially on mobile. I like just one button though.
Maybe it can be a long press action. Kind of a power user thing.
reply
I agree on one button. Long press or overflow action could work IMO
reply
Oh yeah! Overflow is another pattern we're using a lot now.
reply
Yea, we should try not to over-user it, but it might make sense here ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
reply
I guess we could put it in the existing overflow for now. I mostly just want to hide the stuff we use 5% of the time.
deleted by author
reply