pull down to refresh
related posts
311 sats \ 0 replies \ @Marcus_Cicero 20 Sep 2023
The onus of proof is on he who asserts the positive. This is why the negative holds the field.
You want something from people or want them to do something its your job to prove why its needed.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @TonyGiorgio 20 Sep 2023
Lol no thanks I do not want to lose brain cells here. I guess it's better than ordinals topics.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 20 Sep 2023
Another "hit piece"/clickbait by BM...
"readers" have no fucking clue what is going on... they just click to get the 5 sats for the article.
THIS IS THE FUCKING TRUTH!
Nobody's paying attention to what really is happening.
Only less than 1% of bitcoiners really understand the debate of "drivechains".
I do not have any opinion on this debate, because I do not have such technical expertise to have an opinion. When I do not know something about a specific thing in Bitcoin, I just STFU.
But like Giacomo Zucco said, all the midwitts now have an "opinion" without knowing any tech details.
Please let the technical details to be firstly debated in the tech circles, do not interfere and try to manipulate (clueless) public opinion about that. Public opinion means shit.
I asked here for a serious open AMA with all Bitcoin devs and gurus....
NOBODY wants to do that. Why? Because they do not want an open debate. They like fights on twatter. and appearances on individual podcasts.. totally useless.
reply