pull down to refresh
120 sats \ 8 replies \ @locomancell 11 Sep 2023 \ on: What would you do if you received unexpected bitcoin from a known entity? bitcoin
Bitcoin is integreity, so bitcoiners should be integral as well, that's the philosophy behind it.
My 2 sats
I agree with this sentiment but if the sender is a known bad actor like FTX, Celsius, BlockFi, etc. I would feel an obligation to not return it to them because they have stolen billions of dollars worth of bitcoin from their users.
reply
Well this then would be a spacial scenario where I also agree with you 🙌
reply
The sending party should have the integrity to secure their sats
reply
A mistake could happen to anyone, even to you my fren...
imo, if we're not willing to change with the CHANGE, then what's the point of changing anyways?
reply
Mistakes don't happen to people. People create mistakes. If a person made a mistake that lost their sats, they were never fit to hold those sats. There are no mistakes on the Timechain. Respect its integrity. No second chances. This is radical responsibility. You're free to fall for any scam, including sending back the "mistaken" sats. We shouldn't use out-of-band integrity to remedy this problem. Better to give holders the tools to mitigate loss themselves i.e. OP_VAULT, covenants, etc.
reply
I respect your criteria but Sorry I don't agree. I am not raised to be like that
... though BTC is for everyone, no such thing this and that don't deserve no sats, like I said imo
reply
FYI BTC is for ANYONE not everyone. Not enough UTXOs for everyone, never will be. Sats will accumulate to those addresses which are most fit to hold them on behalf of the 99%. There are technical reasons that make BTC a meritocracy. If you wanted welfare, go back to fiat.
reply
Lol No need for the aggression bud.. I can respect but not agree.. nough said
reply