pull down to refresh

Is there anything that isn't running on AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud at this point? We sure did a bang-up job of centralising the internet, I guess that's what the money and incentives do
I wonder if in the future miners will spin up data centers too it makes sense as a complimentary business doesn't it?
Why would you trust Amazon with something like this?
reply
🤷‍♂️ amazon already runs a good portion of the internet. Seems they’ve proven their worth and reliability.
If the bitcoin protocol is truly the future of the internet then everyone will be offering this eventually.
reply
I'd like to think that this could be a positive thing; but with everything I've come to understand about their way of doing things makes me very much doubt this.
Amazon, by having 'competitor's shops' within their own shop for a number of years now, has used the telemetry to see how their competitors earn money and have used this data to undercut them. It might be a dollar here or a dollar there - but ultimately they'll have a monopoly.
The point that you make that they're reliable is true - but also that they've reliably misused their power - whether it's the example above, or how they treat their employees.
Just as Elon Musk decided to pull the plug on Starlink services for the Ukraine at a crucial moment when he wanted to - what's to stop AWS doing the same when there's voting for a hard fork?
You can't 'vote' when there's a potential hard fork if you no longer have a node.
Just my two sats.
reply
Why not? It is reliable and maybe cheaper if you don't want to run your own node for a long time to compensate for hardware costs. Like lightning nodes, many are in AWS and Google. See here https://mempool.space/lightning Sadly, it is very hard to change this. Society is very used to trust someone else.
reply
Maybe more reliable than raspi node but is it more competively priced?
reply
reply
a lot of lightning service providers use AWS including voltage
reply