52 sats \ 0 replies \ @shyfire 2 May 2022
Once again we see the competent industrial players correcting the misguided perceptions of braindead politicians.
It would be nice to see a competent politician for a change who actually understands complex topics and does not think it's just a series of tubes.
Sidenote: given what we saw with the shitcoinery (I believe it was SOL) at the highest levels of the EU parliament in the recently leaked EU documents, it's probably safe to assume that there was some equivalent shitcoinery going on behind the scenes with these "members of congress" who sent the original letter to the EPA.
reply
31 sats \ 1 reply \ @BTCMiner OP 2 May 2022
reply
31 sats \ 0 replies \ @BTCMiner OP 2 May 2022
reply
39 sats \ 0 replies \ @itsrealfake 2 May 2022
Raises a question for me...
How many transactions does SWIFT process per day? Surely fewer than the bitcoin network?
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @BTCMiner OP 2 May 2022
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @BTCMiner OP 2 May 2022
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @BTCMiner OP 2 May 2022
Here's an article in Decrypt about this:
Saylor, Dorsey, Other Bitcoin Advocates Send Letter to EPA Rebutting House Democrats' 'Misperceptions' - Decrypt
https://decrypt.co/99200/saylor-dorsey-other-bitcoin-advocates-send-letter-epa-rebutting-house-democrats-misperceptions
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @BTCMiner OP 3 May 2022
And an article in Bitcoin Magazine:
Michael Saylor, Jack Dorsey Pen Letter To EPA Refuting Bitcoin Energy FUD
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/markets/michael-saylor-jack-dorsey-pen-letter-to-epa-refuting-bitcoin-energy-fud
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BTCMiner OP 3 May 2022
And from BTC Times:
Michael Saylor and Jack Dorsey Crush Bitcoin Mining Concerns With Letter to EPA
https://www.btctimes.com/news/michael-saylor-and-jack-dorsey-crush-bitcoin-mining-concerns-with-letter-to-epa
reply