38 sats \ 0 replies \ @0391398253 2 May 2022
my stack just doubled!! not drawning, sharing.
reply
31 sats \ 2 replies \ @south_korea_ln 1 May 2022
So, the sats distributed out are fully covered by the incoming sats from job postings? Or is some own capital used for that? Just curious, no need to share if not opportune at this point ;)
reply
27 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 2 May 2022
No outside capital is used. It's all from ~jobs, boost, and posting/comment fees
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @south_korea_ln 2 May 2022
Nice!
reply
24 sats \ 8 replies \ @2big2fail 1 May 2022
that means kyc is coming 🫢
reply
2110 sats \ 6 replies \ @k00b 1 May 2022
I'm only going to KYC people who tell me what I plan on doing. 👋
reply
12 sats \ 5 replies \ @2big2fail 1 May 2022
touché!!!
reply
7 sats \ 4 replies \ @k00b 1 May 2022
In all seriousness, I like Zebedee's KYC model: below 250k sats in the wallet it's KYC-free. Maybe we'll figure out a decent non-custodial UX before then though.
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @2big2fail 1 May 2022
i wondered if using the pub key method in value4value would work to just have sats move peer to peer
reply
10 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 1 May 2022
It's a clean UX for receiving, for sure.
But what if the payment fails after you hit the tip button? What if you navigate away from the page before I can tell you it failed? What if the receiving user's node is offline?
There's also the issue of spending limits. If you connect SN to your node, you don't want SN to be able to spend all your money. AFAIK node permissions are not granular yet. We'd have to connect to an lnbits instance or something to get decent granularity.
Anyway, I don't expect you to have the answers. I only mean to demonstrate it's non-trivial to provide a good non-custodial UX for a product like SN.
reply
2 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 1 May 2022
Custodial is just fine for the sats received and used on SN.
People are so obsessed with having all "non-custodial" but in the meantime they still use a bank account. Fucking hell, why they forget that?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @tbonesteaks 2 May 2022
100% agree
reply on another page
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @0391398253 2 May 2022
wouldnt be a surprise if we see that kind of requeriment, you know, terrorism and that stuff.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Ge 2 May 2022
Glad to be apart of it and I'll keep coming back for more!
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @UlfMoby 2 May 2022
👍
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Heatzy 2 May 2022 freebie
KYC comming ? i see the graph its interessting