Given you can log in with lightning or nostr, I don’t see the need for what’s proposed here? You can generate as many throwaway keys as you want, login using them for one post then never again?
I think the notion of explicitly being "anon" as opposed to just any throwaway account has some kind of cultual meaning that might be desirable
Edit: But I agree that throwaway account solves anons usecase for e.g. whistleblowers
reply
You’re not wrong, I just think making anon pseudo-accounts gets dangerously close to throwaway accounts, which would render anon useless in my perspective
Perhaps if we added the ability to decorate anon comments on anon posts if they’re from the same anon, that might solve the issue?
reply
deleted by author
reply
There's also the fact that they might end up leaving sats in the account.
reply
That only hurts other stackers, right? Since anon’s sats go to the rewards pool?
reply
Emotionally it hurts us zero-inbox type anons 😆
reply
deleted by author
reply