0 sats \ 2 replies \ @ryu 3 Sep 2023 \ on: What's the TLDR for Drive Chains? bitcoin
The only actual reason I'm advocating for them is because Bitcoiners already propped up Liquid as actual Bitcoin.
Any opposition to drivechains (unless you disliked them from the beginning) is halfhearted after that.
write
preview
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @TonyGiorgio 3 Sep 2023
Bitcoiners already propped up Liquid as actual Bitcoin
Nobody has, and nobody uses it. Sounds like you're supporting a screwed up softfork out of some misguided spite lmfao great reason.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ryu 3 Sep 2023
I've seen some sing Liquid's praises, and Blockstream's overall (aside from maybe the Jade wallet, fuck them).
To give a better reason, I feel drivechains have the ability to further expedite and optimize transactions by freeing up the mempool, but it needs to be implemented properly.
Giving more control to the miners is a double edged sword; I feel a hybrid approach that incentivizes both miner power, and the consensus Bitcoin is known for, would be ideal. Don't know if such an approach would require yet another hard fork though.
reply