NAKAMOTO’S BITCOIN CONFRONTS OCCAM’S RAZOR This brings us to the English philosopher, William of Occam (1270 to 1347) and his famous principle, “Occam’s razor,” which can be expressed and applied in a litany of ways.
One description of this principle posits that the more exceptions that exist for a rule, system or device, the more fragile, or insubstantial that rule, system or device really is. For example, a contractor may claim that their firm has developed the most effective, powerful weapon in modern history. As they demonstrate the weapon, a number of exceptions emerge: It cannot be employed at night, it malfunctions in the rain, it requires extensive maintenance, it cannot be exposed to dust, etc. In light of the many exceptions and caveats to its performance, it does not live up to its billing: it’s actually not the most powerful weapon in modern history. In fact, such a weapon would be profoundly unimpressive.
Occam was not a scientist or technician. He was a philosopher. His theory refers to problem solving, not "rule, system, or device." Occam's Razor can be applied in support of bitcoin. Rather than the twisted layers of rehypothication and derivates applied to fiat currency, bitcoin is a simple, pure bearer asset. The base layer, in fact, has been criticized as too simple by some.
reply
"The base layer, in fact, has been criticized as too simple by some."
This is true and I find it funny, because the most profound things in our human record are the simplest: fire, wheel, Pasteurization, compass, rolling ink on paper, electricity, 1s and 0s of binary code, etc.
reply
100%. Usually the real big innovations' first iterations of the innovation are the purest and best leaps forward. This is why Bitcoin is tens of thousands in fiat price and Shiba Pepe Coin is worthless.
reply
Exactly
reply
deleted by author
reply
You're right. I'm sorry I responded. I'm flagging them now.
reply
deleted by author
reply
why did you said that?
reply
Seems yours as well
reply
Exactly
reply