pull down to refresh
related posts
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 13 Sep
Introduction of the paper is typical shitcoiner mostly unfounded criticism of LN.
-
ZKP is a potential solution to solve many things…
-
Rollups have more capital locked that lightning (why should we care, if a one sats lightning capa was enough to handle all the transactions happening that would be great)
-
LN has only 160m USD (number completly false and orders of magnitude smaller than what is actually « locked » into it) but is also capital inefficient. Well it seems that 160 m is enough right now to scale Bitcoin so shouldn’t you be happy ?
This intro starts badly lol.
That would be surprising that a guy with such a way of seeing LN, let’s say with a bit of dishonesty, has taken time to think about and actually help scaling Bitcoin.
Hope I’ll be wrong and that his idea it leads to improvement in Bitcoin L2, but this smells not good at first sight.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @TonyGiorgio 22 Aug 2023
This is very useful, thanks for posting it in a Google drive. Will try to revisit it later.
reply