pull down to refresh

Bet with a Shitcoiner
132 sats \ 10 comments \ @grayruby 19 Aug 2023 bitcoin
Reaching out to the crowd for ideas how to execute this.
I want to bet a shitcoiner that ETH will not flip Bitcoin anytime in the next 3 years.
I am giving him odds. I put up 10M sats, he puts up 5M sats, winner gets the pot if either ETH flips Bitcoin (hahaha) or the 3 year time limit ends and Bitcoin is still king (duh).
What is the best way to execute?
write
preview
related posts
201 sats \ 4 replies \ @monaco 19 Aug 2023
Using Bitcoin's Taproot upgrade, you can create a Pay-to-Taproot (P2TR) address that embeds specific conditions within the contract, allowing for a more private and efficient arrangement. Both parties would need to agree on a reliable data source to determine whether Ethereum flips Bitcoin, as well as define the exact terms of "flipping." Once the details are settled, both parties would send their agreed-upon amounts, in this case, 10M and 5M sats, to the P2TR address.
The scripting would involve the creation of time-locked conditions that allow for the release of funds to the winner based on the bet's outcome. A 3-year time lock can be included to release the funds to the party betting on Bitcoin if Ethereum does not exceed Bitcoin's market cap within the specified timeframe.
reply
20 sats \ 2 replies \ @mallardshead 19 Aug 2023
Is this easier than a scriptless DLC which requires 2/2 multisig funding and a CET for a binary outcome? Or is that what you're describing?
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @monaco 19 Aug 2023
DLCs, involving a 2/2 multisig funding and Contract Execution Transactions (CETs), offer more privacy but are more complex to set up. They require oracles to sign possible outcomes without revealing contract specifics. Time-locked Taproot scripts, on the other hand, provide a more transparent approach, embedding conditions directly within Bitcoin's script and possibly incorporating an oracle if needed. While DLCs might be the choice for those prioritizing privacy and scalability, a Taproot-based approach might be easier for those looking for straightforward execution.
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @mallardshead 19 Aug 2023
Great thanks for this. You're right, DLC's are complex and specification is a work in progress. I tried last year by running Bitcoin-S on my node and using Suredbits oracle explorer but could never get to the CET execution. Maybe I was just too stupid, or there's been a since updated spec, but I'm going to try again with the PLTC method you described, cuz we need a tutorial up for the inbound StackerSports gambling escapades.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby OP 19 Aug 2023
Excellent info. Thanks.
reply
30 sats \ 0 replies \ @carlosfandango 19 Aug 2023
Not sure. But taking sats off someone who (I’m guessing) will lose their money on ETH seems like double pain…
reply
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @2bithits 19 Aug 2023
Is he a good friend?
There are probably better ways, but I would get another neutral friend to hold it in a multisig 2/3. After 3 years the winner & escrow can sign & collect
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby OP 20 Aug 2023
No, I don't consort with shitcoiners. Just a random .eth I argue with on twitter all the time.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Longtermwizard 19 Aug 2023 freebie
I wanna bet too, if there is a way to bet with a eth fan I want to try.
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @mallardshead 19 Aug 2023
deleted by author
reply