The Intercept recently released an article that publisher Julian Assange might be offered a 'plea deal' in order to be released.
If you remember fiat payment processing companies such as Visa, MasterCard moved together to prevent Assange's Wikileaks from receiving funds. Assange asked for donations via Bitcoin instead. This brought about Satoshi to say,
“It would have been nice to get this attention in any other context.
WikiLeaks has kicked the hornet’s nest, and the swarm is headed towards us.”
For me, the most telling reason for this potential attitude change comes at the end:
“This is a sign that they don’t want this playing out in American courts, particularly during an election cycle,” Shipton told Sky News on Monday, “so the U.S. administration is really looking for an off-ramp here for what is an extremely, extremely controversial press freedom prosecution.”
FWIW I've put this post under 'bitcoin' as it might be interesting to see what plays out.
The Intercept's full article follows...
+++
U.S. Official Hints At Possible Plea Deal For Julian Assange
By Prem Thakker August 14 2023, 5:56 p.m.
The United States is considering a plea deal that would allow WikiLeaks founder and whistleblower Julian Assange to return to Australia, the Sydney Morning Herald reported Monday.
U.S. Ambassador to Australia Caroline Kennedy told the Morning Herald that there could be a “resolution” to Assange’s now-four-year detention in Britain. Assange, an Australian citizen, has been held in a London prison since 2019 while combating U.S. extradition efforts. He faces 18 criminal charges in the U.S., 17 of which allege violations of the Espionage Act.
Kennedy’s comments come weeks after U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken rebuffed Australia’s calls to end the prosecution against Assange. After a July meeting with Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong in Brisbane, Blinken said the whistleblower was “charged with very serious criminal conduct” for his role in publishing classified American government materials. The files Assange shared in 2010 included footage of a U.S. airstrike in Baghdad that killed 18 civilians — including journalists — and hundreds of thousands of field reports from the Iraq War.
“There is a way to resolve it,” Kennedy said on Assange’s detention, adding that a plea deal would be “up to the Justice Department.” The Department of Justice declined to comment. The State Department did not respond to The Intercept’s request for comment.
“The administration appears to be searching for an off-ramp ahead of [the prime minister’s] first state visit to DC in October,” Gabriel Shipton, Assange’s brother, told The Intercept. “If one isn’t found we could see a repeat of a very public rebuff delivered by Tony Blinken to the Australian Foreign Minister two weeks ago in Brisbane.”
Dan Rothwell, an international law expert at Australian National University, told the Morning Herald that he believes a likely outcome would involve American authorities downgrading the charges against Assange in exchange for a guilty plea, while taking into account the four years he has already spent in prison.
In May, Kennedy met with a cross-party delegation of parliamentary supporters of Assange. “The U.S. and Australia have a very important and close relationship, and it’s time to demonstrate that,” Independent MP Andrew Wilkie said at the time.
Assange’s case has raised major press freedom concerns around the globe. “The United States is applying extra-territorial reach by charging Assange, who is not a US citizen and did not commit alleged crimes in the US, under its Espionage Act,” a group of former Australian attorneys general wrote to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese last week. “We believe that this sets a very dangerous precedent and has the potential to put at risk anyone, anywhere in the world, who publishes information that the US unilaterally deems to be classified for security reasons.”
As part of WikiLeaks’ release of documents, Assange coordinated with outlets like Spain’s El País, France’s Le Monde, the U.K.’s The Guardian, and the New York Times to release classified cables revealing the inner-workings of bargaining, diplomacy, and threat-making around the world.
Assange has faced legal pressure since his mass documents leak in 2010; he sought asylum in Ecuador in 2012 and lost it before being imprisoned in London. In June, the Morning Herald reported that the FBI was seeking new information about Assange, disturbing the sense of optimism in Australia that had come from Kennedy’s meeting with lawmakers.
The ambassador’s latest comments have renewed hope from Assange’s family for a solution to the 13-year-long limbo he has faced.
“This is a sign that they don’t want this playing out in American courts, particularly during an election cycle,” Shipton told Sky News on Monday, “so the U.S. administration is really looking for an off-ramp here for what is an extremely, extremely controversial press freedom prosecution.”
It is bizarre to call this plea-deal an off-ramp. The US government could end this instantly by giving up on the extradition. But that would send a message that foreigners can escape the clutches of the US government by simply stalling for long enough.
So, this plea deal is not an off-ramp; it's an attempt to speed up the extradition process! The US government isn't tired of this case; they're frustrated that they haven't had the chance to kill Assange sooner!
As stated in the article, the relevant laws don't apply to Assange, so the US government's case has no future in a non-rigged court case. If Assange accepts the plea deal and somehow survives to stand trial, he'd get the maximum sentence (like Ross Ulbright) -- despite the laws not applying to him.
Much more likely is that we will see a repeat of the Jeffrey Epstein incident. He'd wind up in a US jail and die in a mysterious way. Afterall, many of the same people who stood to lose from Epstein going to court, now stand to lose if Assange goes to court.
If Assange and those supporting him have any sense, they will see any plea deal as tantamount to giving up -- as giving up Assange to die at the hands of the US government.
reply
Thankfully, it looks unlikely that Julian would agree if it would mean extradition:
The complication was that Assange would be required to travel to the US and admit guilt, he said.
“Everything we know about Julian Assange suggests this would be a significant sticking point for him,” Rothwell said.
He added: “It’s not possible to strike a plea deal outside the relevant jurisdiction except in the most exceptional circumstances.”
But Shipton said the idea of his brother travelling to the US to strike a deal was a “non-starter” because of the risk it could lead him to attempt suicide.
“Julian cannot go to the US under any circumstances,” he said.
The Age, August 14 2023
reply
1012 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 17 Aug 2023
Just pardon him already.
U.S. Ambassador to Australia Caroline Kennedy told the Morning Herald that there could be a “resolution” to Assange’s now-four-year detention in Britain. Assange, an Australian citizen, has been held in a London prison since 2019 while combating U.S. extradition efforts.
This undersells over a decade of persecution for merely being a more efficient and uncorrupted journalist.
reply
Governments never liked journalists that weren't in their pockets.
reply