I bet he's wrong if you frame it differently. If you think about the impact compounded over all the folks and projects encouraged and informed as side effects of Bitcoin park the return will possibly be greater. It may not go in the founders pockets but someone is benefiting.
Although I guess he might have it in his brain, and not say it out loud. But biggest way to get ROI on his billions in btc is to help surrounding ecosystem flourish, not keep endlessly stacking and centralizing.
Here's the content of the link:
I bet he's wrong if you frame it differently. If you think about the impact compounded over all the folks and projects encouraged and informed as side effects of Bitcoin park the return will possibly be greater. It may not go in the founders pockets but someone is benefiting.
That's my thought at least.
You're right, the "problem" is that the benefits are likely externalized. It's likely very generative though.
Odell might not have more Bitcoin, but maybe, just maybe, this investment makes the Bitcoin he does have more valuable.
Yep. My bet is he looks back in 20 years and says it was the second best investment of his life
There is no second best investment
Yup. Wish Saylor had more of this mindset.
Although I guess he might have it in his brain, and not say it out loud. But biggest way to get ROI on his billions in btc is to help surrounding ecosystem flourish, not keep endlessly stacking and centralizing.
opensats has plenty of grant money now though