25 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 22 Apr 2022 \ parent \ on: What’s your ratio of time looking at SN vs. twitter? meta
Pretty easy. The hard part would be getting users on it.
I was discussing this with someone earlier today. Twitter-like social networks require very large amounts of people to work relative to a site like SN. On SN we are all sharing 21 posts, like we are around a campfire as @dk says. This is valuable even for a handful of people. On Twitter we are all spread out and have to find each other individually; when there are more people it's easier to find someone you think is interesting, but hard if there are few people.
I like the campfire analogy and that’s what I love SN over Twitter. Long may it remain IMO
reply
I hope someday the infrastructure/tooling that powers SN could let 1000s of campfires bloom.
reply