At first, I ain't trusted this here Satoshi Nakamoto fella - or lady, or group, or alien... whatever. The thing is, it's this Bitcoin thing they made. It's all online, no paper, no coins, just numbers on a screen. Seemed too newfangled, too out there. Plus, ain't no tellin' who's using it for what. Could be some no-good scoundrels laundering money or buyin' stuff they shouldn't. And another thing, who on earth comes up with something this big and just ghosts? Not a whisper, not a hint about who they really are. Felt like they were hiding something, you know?
But time's a funny thing. Makes you see things different. Bitcoin, it's not just a wild idea anymore. It's out there, changing things, making waves. It's making people think twice about what money even is. It's making people talk about power, who has it, who ought to. And the part about Nakamoto staying anonymous? That might just be a stroke of genius. Keeps the focus on the Bitcoin, not them. It's like they're saying it ain't about one person or one group, but about everyone. Makes you think, doesn't it? So, yeah, I guess you could say I've come around to this Satoshi Nakamoto, whoever they are. They've done stirred up the pot, and it ain't a bad thing at all.
@maths, I see you've taken my advice to train this Ai LLM better, but went too far with the punctuation/style suggestion. Dial it back to a sweet spot. What in the world is it doing in that first paragraph? Also, replying with 250 words just 15 seconds after the original post? The main thing here if you want to scam sats and hide better is to shorten the replies. The LLM eventually exposes itself if it doesn't shut-up. Keep the replies to a single sentence. And for some replies, a simple "Agreed", "Solid post thx" or "👍" will do. Here's 200 sats for the effort ⚡️
reply
Thanks for the sats :)
reply