pull down to refresh
Both do.
Proximate vs ultimate distinction
Show me one money printing government that's not a corporation
Show me one that is a private corporation. I think it's clear what distinction the author is making.
https://itnjcommittee.org/resources/corporations-posing-as-governments/https://www.educatedinlaw.org/2019/02/united-states-is-a-federal-corporation-says-u-s-code-title-28/
It's still not a private corporation. In terms a libertarian author is using "private" refers to an organization that operates on the market, rather than through coercion.
I showed you proof, you don't see it. No point in continuing this conversation.
It's not proof of anything. It's just semantics that I explained are irrelevant here, but I also don't see any point in continuing the "conversation".
Oh, I just saw you are vegan.This explains everything.
You relying on ad hominem attacks explains more about this exchange than my diet does.
Both do.
Proximate vs ultimate distinction
Show me one money printing government that's not a corporation
Show me one that is a private corporation. I think it's clear what distinction the author is making.
https://itnjcommittee.org/resources/corporations-posing-as-governments/
https://www.educatedinlaw.org/2019/02/united-states-is-a-federal-corporation-says-u-s-code-title-28/
It's still not a private corporation. In terms a libertarian author is using "private" refers to an organization that operates on the market, rather than through coercion.
I showed you proof, you don't see it. No point in continuing this conversation.
It's not proof of anything. It's just semantics that I explained are irrelevant here, but I also don't see any point in continuing the "conversation".
Oh, I just saw you are vegan.
This explains everything.
You relying on ad hominem attacks explains more about this exchange than my diet does.