pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 6 replies \ @llamabyte 27 Jul 2023 \ parent \ on: What's something bitcoiners do that HURTS adoption more than it helps? bitcoin
Feminist bitcoin will kill bitcoin.
Bitcoin is neutral.
It doesn't need more women. It doesn't need less women.
It needs exactly the amount of men or women that need and can use it.
Does USD need more women representation ? Or gold? What a silly sentence.
first, what
second, women representation is key when it comes to adoption but that may not be your priority
reply
Oh, i see, the topic was about adoption. lol, nvm. Yeah i see what you mean.
reply
sometimes i reply to stuff in my notifications not remembering what the initial topic was about.
reply
If no women ever use bitcoin it won't change the usefulness or use case for bitcoin.
Bitcoin no more needs women representation then it needs any other conceivable category.
It's neutral.
I get it, you want more women in bitcoin, but it's like saying Gold needs more women. It doesn't make sense. Gold is Gold. If you are interested in Gold an its properties you will be interested in it.
Bitcoin is bitcoin, if you like and need what it has to offer you will adopt it regardless of gender, or any other factor.
If no women ever adopt bitcoin, it will still be the best money out there. Women need Bitcoin.
reply
I get your argument. I'm arguing for representation that is public facing (i.e. media)
reply
Let's think about this another way.
If all public representation of bitcoin was only women.
What benefit would be added to bitcoin ?
reply